🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.